February (2nd Notebook)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Overview of the 2nd International Competition on Wikipedia Vandalism Detection
The paper overviews the vandalism detection task of the PAN’11 competition. A new corpus is introduced which comprises about 30 000 Wikipedia edits in the languages English, German and Spanish as well as the necessary crowdsourced annotations. Moreover, the performance of three vandalism detectors is evaluated and compared to those of the PAN’10 competition. Vivien Petras and Paul Clough (Eds.)...
متن کاملWallace and Darwin
term the common ancestral state of members of a group); morphology (arguing that the “natural inference of an unprejudiced person” is to recognize that homologous structures “are true records of the progress of the organic world); domestication (maintaining that divergent animal breeds constitute evidence of mutability, and offering thought experiments to show that there is no good reason to th...
متن کاملUJM at CLEF in Author Identification Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2014
This article describes our proposal for the Author Identification task in the PAN CLEF Challenge 2014. We have adopted a machine learning approach based on several representations of the texts and on optimized decision trees which have as entry various attributes and which are learned for every training corpus separately for this classification task. Our method ranked us at the 2nd place with a...
متن کاملAuthor Verification: Basic Stacked Generalization Applied To Predictions from a Set of Heterogeneous Learners - Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2015
In this paper we present the system we submitted to the PAN 2015 competition for the author verification task. We consider the task as a supervised classification problem, where each case in a dataset is an instance. Our approach combines the output from multiple learners using basic stacked generalization. The individual learners are obtained using five distinct approaches, each trained using ...
متن کاملExpert evaluation vs bibliometric evaluation: experiences from Finland
Received: 22 February 2008 Revised: 28 February 2008 2nd Revision: 9 March 2008 Accepted: 9 March 2008 Abstract Research assessment can be based either on expert evaluation or bibliometric evaluation. This opinion paper evaluates pros and cons of these two approaches, concluding that they are complementary approaches. Therefore, they should be properly combined and synchronized to form an infor...
متن کامل